- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:48:44 +0200
- To: Sebastian Tramp <tramp@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Cc: Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
On 23 Jun 2012, at 17:11, Sebastian Tramp wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:54:59AM +0200, Andrei Sambra wrote: > > Hi all, > > since we discussed this problem e.g. at the FSW in Berlin and on other places, > I had some material about webid delegation already finished. > > I've created a wiki page here: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebID/Delegation Great work! Thanks. > I've added an extended sequence image and some structure and hope we can take > this as a base for future discussion. Also note that we have this implemented > since 3 years in OntoWiki (to allow inter-OntoWiki communication) but with > other namings. Currently, Phil is reworking this part so that others (e.g. > Andrei) can use that too (the link is added to the page too) Great. yes, we should try to come to agree on some naming scheme. I hope to be able to implement this soonish. The read-write-web rewrite in Play 2.0 is moving ahead.... Then we can test and write it out nicely. But don't let my slowness slow you down :-) Henry > > Best regards > > Sebastian Tramp > >>> I understand you to be saying above that you are thinking of the secretary >>> robot connecting to some server (say on IBM.com), and then make a request >>> on that resource but somehow adding a ?id=webid to the url it was going to >>> request? How would it know that that resource understood the same thing that >>> you thought you meant when adding ?id=webid to the resource? There may not >>> even be a resource there. (those are 2 different URLs) >>> >>> That does not seem very RESTful. It would require 2 requests on the >>> resource: one where you get the version without the ?id=webid fields, and it >>> returns some information telling you how you can GET a version for the >>> secretary namely in your case by adding a ?id=webid field (perhaps it >>> returns a semantically annotated form). >> >> Yes, you are right. I feared that using an extra HTTP header option would >> require support from the webserver, but I was wrong. Indeed, specifying the >> identity of the real person in the header would be the best solution. > > > > > -- > WebID: http://sebastian.tramp.name Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 06:49:27 UTC