Re: CSS issue about incremental font loading opt-in mechanism

Looks good to me.

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:55 PM Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> Looks good to me.
>
> I don't see anyone objecting to "new tech needs new keyword" so the only
> pushback that is likely would be "we tested `supports` and don't see a
> need" to which the answer would be, how will you support this new
> incremental stuff then.
>
> I see its tagged css-fonts-5, which I think is reasonable given the
> timescales for our stuff, and that css-fonts-4 might make it to CR in a
> year or less with a following wind.
>
> On 2021-03-02 13:32, Myles C. Maxfield wrote:
> > I’ve created it here:
> > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6063
> > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6063>. Please tell me if
> > anything should be changed/updated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Myles
>
> --
> Chris Lilley
> @svgeesus
> Technical Director @ W3C
> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>
>
>