- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:55:25 -0500
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
Looks good to me. I don't see anyone objecting to "new tech needs new keyword" so the only pushback that is likely would be "we tested `supports` and don't see a need" to which the answer would be, how will you support this new incremental stuff then. I see its tagged css-fonts-5, which I think is reasonable given the timescales for our stuff, and that css-fonts-4 might make it to CR in a year or less with a following wind. On 2021-03-02 13:32, Myles C. Maxfield wrote: > I’ve created it here: > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6063 > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6063>. Please tell me if > anything should be changed/updated. > > Thanks, > Myles -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director @ W3C W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2021 21:55:27 UTC