- From: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 04:56:34 +0900
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webed@w3.org
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > Thank you so much Masataka! I have given it a bit of an edit to clear up a few small grammar points. Thank you Chris! That would help improving my English writing :) > I guess a question to ask now is - in these situations, do we always want to present the CSS3 way as the way to do it, or do we want to present the CSS 2 way as the way to do it, but then show the CSS3 additions separately? I think the way you've got it laid out here is actually pretty helpful and works nicely. For now, I would like to go the latter. Firefox and WebKit haven't had support for background-position offsets yet, and they haven't added bg-size to the shorthand. (Opera and IE9 do a better job here :) Given the browser support I'd rather say that CSS3 features should be written separately. I was thinking about including these browser support while writing, but such info would possibly be better fit in MDN. I'll update the refs page, too. Thanks! -- Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 19:57:38 UTC