Re: CSS shorthand reference

Hi, Chris-

On 12/6/11 8:32 AM, Richard D. Worth wrote:
> Looking good. I fixed a few minor typos, added some oxford commas,

See!?  See!?  You should use Oxford commas, Chris!!!

(I recently abused Chris about this topic offlist... ^_^)

> made
> the indentation in code samples consistent, and made the headings
> consistent (some had 'shorthand' others did not, I opted for not).
>
> Wasn't sure how to fix wording on "rarely want to go this granular, for
> will probably use simply"
>
> Also, can we standardize on spelling it "color" instead of "colour" as
> it's consistent with the property in the specs?

I agree... though localization is good, property values, and references 
to terms used in them, should be synced with specs.

Regards-
-Doug

Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 15:03:33 UTC