- From: Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:29:52 -0700
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFswn4mRY4giXcsXK+oKvA+1EGM7b7ixAySVRG_n6nKub+FvHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > Note that the test-suite progress is coming well big +1 to Charles! > > I'd like to see the following on the agenda: > > 1) Test-suite update - is there plans from any of the browser vendors to > change support for algorithms/keys. I believe it's 'no' but worth checking > - for example, 192-bit keys in Chrome will be removed from spec unless > there is interop. > Confirmed -- there are no plans for changing algorithm/key support in Chrome. There are no plans for supporting 192-bit AES keys in Chrome > 2) If MarkW can make it, an update to any open issues. > > 3) In terms of spki/pcks support for WebCrypto, are we happy with either > removing or stating lack of interop? Note that we are still waiting for > Ryan Hurst's proposal, and we do not have importKey/exportKey in > test-suite. > > 4) We still need clarity on when Service Worker support for WebCrypto on > Mozilla will be delivered. > > 5) It would be great if Apple could devote some cycles and drop their > webkit-prefix. > > 6) Writing up the transition request that takes into account test-suite, > closed issues, formal objections - I'm happy to draft this after the > meeting, but would like answers on above. > > Our timing is we want to do the transition request to "Proposed > Recommendation" if possible by end of this month, but at latest by end of > August. > > cheers, > harry > > > On 07/10/2016 11:04 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: > > Dear all. > This is a kind reminder that we will have our regular call on monday 11th > of July @ 20:00 UTC. > Regards, > Virginie > > From my mobile > > > ---- Harry Halpin a écrit ---- > > Just to keep everyone informed, there is no meeting July 4th. We'll > reconvene on July 11th, hopefully having a new version of the spec with > most open issues resolved, and would like to review the near-complete > test-suite with the browser vendors. > > cheers, > harry > > > ------------------------------ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. > > >
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 18:30:26 UTC