- From: Charles Engelke <w3c@engelke.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:13:58 -0400
- To: Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFeVzdz10gs2w7S2+_FsPeqwEpL3irZ-dmfnBLV9qwTnwZwe8w@mail.gmail.com>
Edge does support 192-bit keys for AES-CBC and AES-GCM (AES-CTR does not seem to be supported yet). So there may be the necessary two implementations. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > >> Note that the test-suite progress is coming well big +1 to Charles! >> >> I'd like to see the following on the agenda: >> >> 1) Test-suite update - is there plans from any of the browser vendors to >> change support for algorithms/keys. I believe it's 'no' but worth checking >> - for example, 192-bit keys in Chrome will be removed from spec unless >> there is interop. >> > > Confirmed -- there are no plans for changing algorithm/key support in > Chrome. > There are no plans for supporting 192-bit AES keys in Chrome > > >> 2) If MarkW can make it, an update to any open issues. >> >> 3) In terms of spki/pcks support for WebCrypto, are we happy with either >> removing or stating lack of interop? Note that we are still waiting for >> Ryan Hurst's proposal, and we do not have importKey/exportKey in >> test-suite. >> >> 4) We still need clarity on when Service Worker support for WebCrypto on >> Mozilla will be delivered. >> >> 5) It would be great if Apple could devote some cycles and drop their >> webkit-prefix. >> >> 6) Writing up the transition request that takes into account test-suite, >> closed issues, formal objections - I'm happy to draft this after the >> meeting, but would like answers on above. >> >> Our timing is we want to do the transition request to "Proposed >> Recommendation" if possible by end of this month, but at latest by end of >> August. >> >> cheers, >> harry >> >> >> On 07/10/2016 11:04 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: >> >> Dear all. >> This is a kind reminder that we will have our regular call on monday 11th >> of July @ 20:00 UTC. >> Regards, >> Virginie >> >> From my mobile >> >> >> ---- Harry Halpin a écrit ---- >> >> Just to keep everyone informed, there is no meeting July 4th. We'll >> reconvene on July 11th, hopefully having a new version of the spec with >> most open issues resolved, and would like to review the near-complete >> test-suite with the browser vendors. >> >> cheers, >> harry >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees >> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or >> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. >> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable >> for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the >> intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. >> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission >> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a >> transmitted virus. >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 19:14:27 UTC