Re: Agenda suggestions for meeting *today* on July 11th

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

> Note that the test-suite progress is coming well big +1 to Charles!
>
>  I'd like to see the following on the agenda:
>
> 1) Test-suite update - is there plans from any of the browser vendors to
> change support for algorithms/keys. I believe it's 'no' but worth checking
> -  for example, 192-bit keys in Chrome will be removed from spec unless
> there is interop.
>
> 2) If MarkW can make it, an update to any open issues.
>

​I can make it.

I suggest we review
(a) this list
<https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3A%22needs%20input%22>
of issues which require input
(b) this list
<https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3A%22needs%20review%22%20>
of issue​s which have proposals that require review

if we have time, there is:
(c) this list
<https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20no%3Alabel%20no%3Aassignee%20-milestone%3AVNext>
of untriaged items.

​There are also 6 items
<https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3A%22needs%20implementation%22>
where we have a disposition and I have the action to implement and one
blocked item <https://github.com/w3c/webcrypto/issues/42>, which is waiting
on one of the items in (b).


> 3) In terms of spki/pcks support for WebCrypto, are we happy with either
> removing or stating lack of interop? Note that we are still waiting for
> Ryan Hurst's proposal, and we do not have importKey/exportKey in
> test-suite.
>
> 4) We still need clarity on when Service Worker support for WebCrypto on
> Mozilla will be delivered.
>
> 5) It would be great if Apple could devote some cycles and drop their
> webkit-prefix.
>
> 6) Writing up the transition request that takes into account test-suite,
> closed issues, formal objections - I'm happy to draft this after the
> meeting, but would like answers on above.
>
> Our timing is we want to do the transition request to "Proposed
> Recommendation" if possible by end of this month, but at latest by end of
> August.
>
>   cheers,
>      harry
>
>
> On 07/10/2016 11:04 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:
>
> Dear all.
> This is a kind reminder that we will have our regular call on monday 11th
> of July @ 20:00 UTC.
> Regards,
> Virginie
>
> From my mobile
>
>
> ---- Harry Halpin a écrit ----
>
> Just to keep everyone informed, there is no meeting July 4th. We'll
> reconvene on July 11th, hopefully having a new version of the spec with
> most open issues resolved, and would like to review the near-complete
> test-suite with the browser vendors.
>
>   cheers,
>     harry
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for
> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> transmitted virus.
>
>
>