- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:36:11 -0700
- To: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20090210182832.037d4258@localhost>
Dave,
Thanks for the feedback. One quick reply...
At 09:37 AM 2/10/2009 -0800, David Cruikshank wrote:
>Regrets...
>
>Approve 4f - 4j
>
>Comment on 4g(2) - does gOE(text) return the same extents as RT Type
>boxed-all, albeit with different representation (rectangle vs xp, yp, dx, dy)?
That is yet TBD. (Tho' personally I believe it is close to our original
intent.) I have been whittling away at preliminaries to get at to Benoit's
core issue about gOE/text, and your question hits on the core issue.
In the next few days, I'll try to issue an ISSUE that presents it with
options, links, comparisons to SVG, etc.
"RT Type boxed-all" may in fact be the effective outcome for our most
common cases -- single-font string with "uniform" metrics, R-to-L text,
etc. But we might need to say a little more to cover odd but legal cases.
-Lofton.
>On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Lofton Henderson
><<mailto:lofton@rockynet.com>lofton@rockynet.com> wrote:
>>
>>[...all -- early draft for Wed. WG telecon -- lotsa' issue references...]
>>
>>Hello WebCGM WG,
>>
>>If you can't attend this week's WG teleconference, please reply (to list)
>>with "regrets".
>>
>>Main topics: Open issues post-LC, post-WD; F2F update
>>
>>WebCGM, Wednesday, 11 February 2009, 11:00am-12:30pm ET
>>(logistics below, following agenda)
>>
>>Previous minutes
>>=====
>>[0]
>><http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/28-webcgm-minutes.html>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/28-webcgm-minutes.html
>>
>>Agenda
>>=====
>>
>>Chair: Lofton
>>
>>Scribe: tbd
>>(See:
>><http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/scribing-guidelines.html>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/scribing-guidelines.html
>>)
>>
>>1.) roll call 11:00am ET,
>> -- agenda: additions?
>> -- any routine WG business?
>>
>>2.) Action: update web page
>> -- for publication of 20090130 WD
>> -- new DoC
>>
>>3.) next F2F: Ann Arbor [1]
>> -- either 27-29 April
>> -- or 23-25 March
>> -- or ...?
>>
>>4.) Open technical threads
>> c.) [Resolved] Interior-style SP [5]
>> -- keep int-styl SP; explain how SPs work
>> -- Action: editor to add to current-editor draft
>>
>> d.) [Resolved] Initial Values of new 2.1 SPs [6]
>> -- change new SP init. values to 'metafile'
>> -- DONE in current-editor draft
>> -- follow-on question [3]
>>
>> e.) [Resolved] getObjectExtent for raster elements [8]
>> -- add sentence to gOE (w/ CGM:1999 refs.) [7]
>> -- Action: editor to add to current-editor draft
>>
>> f.) other getObjectExtent questions: clipping [8]
>> -- Proposed closure: close w/ "clipping does not affect
>> gOE" [8a], [8b]
>>
>> g.) other getObjectExtent questions: text [8]
>> -- Propose: question re: TEXT (non-restricted) is moot. [8d]
>> -- Propose: confirm that goE(text) does NOT treat text
>> as path [8c]
>>
>> h.) ACI formulation of dashLength [9]
>> -- Proposed closure: XML attribute coded as
>> list-of-number [9b]
>> -- (Comments unanimously support this closure.)
>>
>> i.) return mode of getStyleProperty [10]
>> -- Proposed closure: same mode as setStyleProperty [10b]
>> -- (Comments unanimously support this closure).
>>
>> j.) [Reopened] clarification of scale() method [11]
>> -- Initial resolution: NVDC origin, not settable
>> -- DONE in current-editor draft [2]
>> -- REOPENED [11b] -- scaling origin should be settable
>>
>>5.) new AIs to be assigned
>> -- Ben identify test needs fixing for #4a [0]
>> -- ??? identify "several tests" need fixing Int.Styl. SP [0]
>>
>>6.) Next WG telecon: 25 February 2009
>>
>>7.) Adjourn
>>
>>[1]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0008.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0008.html
>>[2]
>>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/current-editor-21/WebCGM21-Appendix.html#webcgm_changelog
>>[3]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0009.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0009.html
>>
>>[5] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00019.html
>>[6]
>><http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00034.html>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00034.html
>>[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Dec/0009.html
>>
>>[8]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Dec/0005.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Dec/0005.html
>>[8a]
>><http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200902/msg00031.html>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200902/msg00031.html
>>[8b]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0011.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0011.html
>>
>>[8c]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0003.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0003.html
>>[8d]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0004.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0004.html
>>
>>[9] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00073.html
>>[9b]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0012.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0012.html
>>
>>[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0024.html
>>[10b]
>><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0010.html>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Feb/0010.html
>>
>>[11] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00055.html
>>[11b]
>><http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200902/msg00032.html>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200902/msg00032.html
>>
>>Logistics
>>----------
>>Zakim bridge +1 617-761-6200 (US) or +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France)
>>code: 932246 ("WEBCGM")
>>IRC, channel #webcgm
>><http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html
>>
>>Regards,
>>Lofton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 01:37:26 UTC