- From: Don Larson <dlarson@cgmlarson.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:40:42 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
I approve.
Don.
> Hi,
> Attention: Don, Benoit (,Chris)
> Of the 4 absentees at the last telecon, only Dieter has responded ("yes")
> to the list so far. We need to be able to document WG approval of our
> chosen 1.0 strategy, because our Charter gives us the discretion to either
> publish WebCGM 1.0 Third Release or not.
> Therefore, Don and Benoit at least, please reply (to list) with your
> approval. Or your disapproval, if that is the case (and give
> reasons). Chris's input would also be very welcome, of course.
> To summarize the below-linked minutes, our recommended strategy is to get
> 4-week W3C/public review and publish the approved 1.0 errata document, but
> to skip the hassle of republishing an entire new WebCGM 1.0 Third Release
> document (Edited Recommendation).
> Questions?
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
> At 03:37 PM 8/30/2007 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
> >For the four of you who were not at today's telecon, we need your approval
>
> >of the 1.0 errata processing strategy that the four attendees tentatively
> >approved.
> >
> >Long story short, we believe that publication of a reviewed Errata
> >document will suffice, and that publication of a 1.0 Third Release is
> >neither necessary nor desirable -- in fact it might be painful to align
> >that six-year-old document with current pubrules. Details...
> >
> >Today's minutes:
> >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/08/30-webcgm-minutes.htm
> l
> >
> >Please search for the string "publish a new" and start reading at that
> >line. It details our rationale, and also presents the case that the
> >decision is acceptable under W3C Process and the WebCGM WG Charter.
> >
> >Question (for today's absentees): do you agree?
> >
> >Please reply to this message, Cc: to the WebCGM WG list.
> >
> >Regards,
> >-Lofton.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Regards,
Don
Sales Manager
Larson CGM Software
(713)977-4177 x102
www.cgmlarson.com
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 22:42:27 UTC