- From: Don Larson <dlarson@cgmlarson.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:40:42 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
I approve. Don. > Hi, > Attention: Don, Benoit (,Chris) > Of the 4 absentees at the last telecon, only Dieter has responded ("yes") > to the list so far. We need to be able to document WG approval of our > chosen 1.0 strategy, because our Charter gives us the discretion to either > publish WebCGM 1.0 Third Release or not. > Therefore, Don and Benoit at least, please reply (to list) with your > approval. Or your disapproval, if that is the case (and give > reasons). Chris's input would also be very welcome, of course. > To summarize the below-linked minutes, our recommended strategy is to get > 4-week W3C/public review and publish the approved 1.0 errata document, but > to skip the hassle of republishing an entire new WebCGM 1.0 Third Release > document (Edited Recommendation). > Questions? > Regards, > -Lofton. > At 03:37 PM 8/30/2007 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: > >For the four of you who were not at today's telecon, we need your approval > > >of the 1.0 errata processing strategy that the four attendees tentatively > >approved. > > > >Long story short, we believe that publication of a reviewed Errata > >document will suffice, and that publication of a 1.0 Third Release is > >neither necessary nor desirable -- in fact it might be painful to align > >that six-year-old document with current pubrules. Details... > > > >Today's minutes: > >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/08/30-webcgm-minutes.htm > l > > > >Please search for the string "publish a new" and start reading at that > >line. It details our rationale, and also presents the case that the > >decision is acceptable under W3C Process and the WebCGM WG Charter. > > > >Question (for today's absentees): do you agree? > > > >Please reply to this message, Cc: to the WebCGM WG list. > > > >Regards, > >-Lofton. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, Don Sales Manager Larson CGM Software (713)977-4177 x102 www.cgmlarson.com
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 22:42:27 UTC