re: WG assignments -- WebCGM 1.0 Errata review

Lofton,

I have reviewed E10 & E11 and it looks okay as written. 

Don.

 >  Hi All,

 >  I want to make a small assignment for each WG participant, to be completed 
 >  before the Thursday telecon.

 >  I realize that the 1.0 errata document [1] has grown to be bulky, and it 
 >  may be daunting if you're busy.  Therefore, I'd like to have each person 
 >  review two errata, okay?

 >  To remind you of present status... The WebCGM WG approved the substance 
 >  (and Class) of all of the errata solutions at the 8/30 telecon [2] (and the
 >   
 >  WebCGM TC approved the same substance earlier at its f2f).

 >  So your job is to check that the completed text in the document [1] 
 >  correctly implements our approved resolutions, and to check for editorial 
 >  errors.

 >  Chris -- E01 (URI/IRI)
 >  Dieter -- E02, E03
 >  Benoit -- E04, E05
 >  Dave -- E06, E07
 >  Stuart -- E08, E09
 >  Don -- E10, E11

 >  It would be good to email your review ("okay" or corrections), especially 
 >  if you will not be present Thursday.  Feel free to review other ones in 
 >  addition to your assigment.

 >  Thanks in advance,
 >  -Lofton.

 >  At 04:09 PM 9/6/2007 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:

 >  >WebCGM WG --
 >  >
 >  >This should implement all of the decisions that we made at the 8/30 
 >  >telecon (and before):
 >  >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-200706
 >  21.html
 >  >
 >  >It is ready for final editorial approval, which we will do at the 9/13 
 >  >telecon.  Please have a careful look at it before then, and send any 
 >  >comments to this list.  Are there any substantial errors in implementing 
 >  >our decisions?  Any editorial corrections?
 >  >
 >  >After approval, it will have a 4-week (public) review, as it contains a 
 >  >couple of Class 3 corrections.
 >  >
 >  >Regards,
 >  >-Lofton.
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >

Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 22:40:50 UTC