public-webauthn@w3.org from February 2025 by author

Ackermann Yuriy

Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255) (Friday, 7 February)

Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255) (Tuesday, 11 February)
Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255) (Friday, 7 February)
Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255) (Thursday, 6 February)

Addison Phillips via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] [Editorial] Truncation description inaccurate (#1645) (Friday, 21 February)

Akshay Kumar via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2252) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Backup preference for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2253) (Wednesday, 12 February)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Backup Preference Option for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration (#2252) (Monday, 3 February)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Backup preference (Monday, 3 February)
[webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration (#2252) (Monday, 3 February)

Anders Åberg via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256) (Wednesday, 26 February)

ANTHONY J NADALIN

02/26/2025 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 26 February)
02/12/2025 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Agenda (Tuesday, 11 February)

ANTHONY NADALIN

02/19/2025 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Agenda (Wednesday, 19 February)

Anthony Nadalin via GitHub

Closed: [webauthn] Support for PWA authenticators (#1514) (Wednesday, 19 February)

ayanwaar via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Fix tokenBinding definition type (#1661) (Thursday, 27 February)

bigradish via GitHub

Brad Dougherty via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Thursday, 20 February)

Emil Lundberg

[w3c/webauthn] d0d155: Merge pull request #2261 from w3c/test-vectors-hea... (Wednesday, 26 February)
[w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 26 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 559de5: Fix test vectors heading levels (Wednesday, 26 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 559de5: Fix test vectors heading levels (Thursday, 20 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 5b55cd: Merge pull request #2254 from tabatkins/patch-1 (Wednesday, 12 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 89ba88: Handle Bikeshed 5.0.3 (Wednesday, 12 February)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256) (Wednesday, 26 February)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix test vectors heading levels (Wednesday, 26 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 26 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Tuesday, 25 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Tuesday, 25 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] [Editorial] Truncation description inaccurate (#1645) (Friday, 21 February)
Re: [webauthn] supplementalPubKeys attestation incompatible with most verification procedures (#2075) (Friday, 21 February)
Closed: [webauthn] supplementalPubKeys attestation incompatible with most verification procedures (#2075) (Friday, 21 February)
Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262) (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Fix test vectors heading levels (Thursday, 20 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 20 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 12 February)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Handle Bikeshed 5.0.3 (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: [webauthn] Backup preference for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2253) (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a new optional `rpId` to Credential Record (#2258) (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: [webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257) (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255) (Saturday, 8 February)
Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255) (Thursday, 6 February)
Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255) (Thursday, 6 February)
Re: [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration (#2252) (Monday, 3 February)

Firstyear via GitHub

github-actions[bot] via GitHub

[webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 26 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Monday, 24 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 12 February)

James Elliott via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256) (Wednesday, 26 February)
Re: [webauthn] chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template (#2265) (Sunday, 23 February)

Jeffrey Walton via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263) (Friday, 21 February)

John Bradley

Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Tuesday, 25 February)

John Bradley via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Sunday, 23 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Sunday, 23 February)

Kelly Thomas Kline via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Kerrick Long via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Kevin via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2252) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Kyle Simpson via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Friday, 28 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Tuesday, 25 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Tuesday, 25 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Sunday, 23 February)
[webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Saturday, 22 February)

Matthew Miller

[w3c/webauthn] 425cfa: Remove outdated notes about permissions policy (Wednesday, 26 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 88620d: Add a missing period (Wednesday, 26 February)
[w3c/webauthn] cc478f: Open the door to more possibilities (Tuesday, 25 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 39960b: Tweak potential use cases (Tuesday, 25 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 831ec2: Define new `rpId` in Credential Record (Wednesday, 12 February)

Matthew Miller via GitHub

[webauthn] Pull Request: Remove outdated notes about permissions policy on `isUVPAA()` and `getCC()` (Wednesday, 26 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Wednesday, 26 February)
Re: [webauthn] PublicKeyCredential.getClientCapabilities() - clarify required permission (#2251) (Wednesday, 26 February)
Re: [webauthn] PublicKeyCredential.getClientCapabilities() - clarify required permission (#2251) (Wednesday, 26 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Wednesday, 26 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Tuesday, 25 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Tuesday, 25 February)
Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263) (Friday, 21 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Thursday, 20 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Closed: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Accessibility (#2246) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Prepare for CR (#2225) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257) (Wednesday, 12 February)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Add a new optional `rpId` to Credential Record (Wednesday, 12 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Wednesday, 12 February)
[webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257) (Monday, 10 February)

Michael B. Jones via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Nehal Bhanushali via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262) (Tuesday, 25 February)
[webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262) (Thursday, 20 February)

Nick Steele via GitHub

Nina Satragno via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] PublicKeyCredential.getClientCapabilities() - clarify required permission (#2251) (Wednesday, 26 February)
Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: TAG Design Reviews (#2247) (Wednesday, 19 February)

reito via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] continuous assertion (#1785) (Sunday, 9 February)

Scott Leggett via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Thursday, 20 February)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a new optional `rpId` to Credential Record (#2258) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Backup preference for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2253) (Monday, 3 February)

Simone Onofri via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Wide Review (#2248) (Sunday, 23 February)
Re: [webauthn] Prepare for CR (#2225) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Security & Privacy (#2244) (Wednesday, 12 February)

sycamoreoak via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub

[webauthn] Pull Request: Handle Bikeshed 5.0.3 (Tuesday, 4 February)

Thomas Cannon via GitHub

Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Tim Cappalli

[w3c/webauthn] d114e6: Merge pull request #2265 from w3c/timcappalli-patch-3 (Monday, 24 February)
[w3c/webauthn] d7a03d: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template (Monday, 24 February)
[w3c/webauthn] d7a03d: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template (Friday, 21 February)
[w3c/webauthn] (Friday, 21 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 2bf7ed: Merge pull request #2264 from w3c/timcappalli-patch-2 (Friday, 21 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 7eff86: chore: Fix issue template contact links (Friday, 21 February)
[w3c/webauthn] 7eff86: chore: Fix issue template contact links (Friday, 21 February)
[w3c/webauthn] (Friday, 21 February)
Potential WebAuthn F2F/hybrid meeting on 4/11 (Wednesday, 19 February)

Tim Cappalli via GitHub

Closed: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256) (Wednesday, 26 February)
Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256) (Wednesday, 26 February)
Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262) (Wednesday, 26 February)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template (Monday, 24 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Monday, 24 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Sunday, 23 February)
Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Wide Review (#2248) (Sunday, 23 February)
Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266) (Sunday, 23 February)
[webauthn] Pull Request: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] Merged Pull Request: chore: Fix issue template contact links (Friday, 21 February)
Re: [webauthn] chore: Fix issue template contact links (#2264) (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] Pull Request: chore: Fix issue template contact links (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Friday, 21 February)
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli (Friday, 21 February)
Re: [webauthn] chore: Update issue template (#2242) (Friday, 21 February)
Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263) (Friday, 21 February)
Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262) (Friday, 21 February)
Closed: [webauthn] WebAuthn available to Workers? aka "silent authentication" (#199) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn available to Workers? aka "silent authentication" (#199) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Implementation Requirements (#2249) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Closed: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Implementation Requirements (#2249) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Internationalization (i18n) (#2245) (Wednesday, 19 February)
[webauthn] [L3 CR] Internationalization Self-Review (#2260) (Wednesday, 19 February)
Re: [webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257) (Wednesday, 12 February)
Re: [webauthn] Missing tasks in parallel steps in Web Authentication: An API for accessing Public Key Credentials - Level 3 (#2250) (Monday, 10 February)
[webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256) (Monday, 10 February)
Re: [webauthn] Synced/multi-device user Credentials (#1665) (Thursday, 6 February)
Closed: [webauthn] Synced/multi-device user Credentials (#1665) (Thursday, 6 February)
Re: [webauthn] Add a method to get the count of the credentials for a rely party on the client device to support the rely party (website) to limit the number of accounts a user can register (#2222) (Saturday, 1 February)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 25 February)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 18 February)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 11 February)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2025 21:23:57 UTC