Adam Langley
Adam Langley via GitHub
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Differentiate when devicePubKey unsupported vs. failed? (#1846) (Friday, 24 February)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Thursday, 23 February)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Remove redundant extra step in DPK processing. (Wednesday, 22 February)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Redundant step 6 in DPK verification for authentication (#1853) (Wednesday, 22 February)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Wednesday, 22 February)
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Issue 1817 (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Always PRF enabled:false (#1857) (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webauthn] PRF inputs should be BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer (#1851) (Tuesday, 14 February)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: [webauthn] PRF inputs should be BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer (#1851) (Monday, 13 February)
Andrey Paramonov via GitHub
Arian van Putten via GitHub
Carlena Cole via GitHub
charlespick via GitHub
Christiaan Brand
Daniel Cazzulino via GitHub
daro23 via GitHub
Emil Lundberg
Emil Lundberg via GitHub
- Re: [webauthn] Remove redundant extra step in DPK processing. (#1858) (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Redundant step 6 in DPK verification for authentication (#1853) (Monday, 27 February)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Recommend duration of challenge validity (#1855) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Differentiate when devicePubKey unsupported vs. failed? (#1846) (Friday, 24 February)
- Closed: [webauthn] Differentiate when devicePubKey unsupported vs. failed? (#1846) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Redundant step 6 in DPK verification for authentication (#1853) (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Monday, 20 February)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Recommend duration of challenge validity (Monday, 20 February)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Allow conditional and modal flows to run simultaneously (#1854) (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Redundant step 6 in DPK verification for authentication (#1853) (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: [webauthn] PRF inputs should be BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer (#1851) (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: [webauthn] PRF inputs should be BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer (#1851) (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new "note" to registration options for RP's to help users distinguish credentials (#1852) (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [webauthn] PRF inputs should be BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer (#1851) (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: [webauthn] PRF inputs should be BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer (#1851) (Monday, 13 February)
- [webauthn] PRF inputs should be BufferSource instead of ArrayBuffer (#1851) (Friday, 10 February)
- Closed: [webauthn] Use aPAKE/OPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Use aPAKE/OPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Create SECURITY.md (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Create SECURITY.md (#1850) (Monday, 6 February)
Felix Magedanz via GitHub
Firstyear via GitHub
Fredrik Tolf via GitHub
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Saturday, 25 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Saturday, 25 February)
- [webauthn] Clarify how to differentiate between exceptions (#1859) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Monday, 20 February)
- [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Monday, 20 February)
- [webauthn] Allow conditional and modal flows to run simultaneously (#1854) (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: [webauthn] How long the relying party should maintain the challenge and related information? (#1848) (Monday, 20 February)
github-actions[bot] via GitHub
James Elliott via GitHub
John Bradley
John Bradley via GitHub
Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
Kushaal Singla via GitHub
Matthew Miller
Matthew Miller via GitHub
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify how to differentiate between exceptions (#1859) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (#1856) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new "note" to registration options for RP's to help users distinguish credentials (#1852) (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new "note" to registration options for RP's to help users distinguish credentials (#1852) (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new "note" to registration options for RP's to help users distinguish credentials (#1852) (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new "note" to registration options for RP's to help users distinguish credentials (#1852) (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new "note" to registration options for RP's to help users distinguish credentials (#1852) (Tuesday, 14 February)
- [webauthn] Add a new "note" to registration options for RP's to help users distinguish credentials (#1852) (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Closed: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webauthn] How long the relying party should maintain the challenge and related information? (#1848) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Closed: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Define discrete list of pubKeyCredParams algs (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Closed: [webauthn] Pilna zmiana (#1847) (Wednesday, 1 February)
nadalin@prodigy.net
Shane Weeden via GitHub
Stephen McGruer via GitHub
Thomas Duboucher via GitHub
Tim Cappalli
Tim Cappalli via GitHub
W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2023 17:00:43 UTC