>> From: =JeffH [mailto:Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 4:00 PM >> >> should we fixup all occurrences of '<a>...</a>' to be the new hotness >> '[=...=]' ? On 3/2/17 7:18 AM, =JeffH wrote: > vijay replied: >> I was thinking the same thing. Also <em>foo</em> to *foo* maybe? > > sure. well, I've attempted a blanket change of all occurrences of '<a>...</a>' to be '[=...=]' and bikeshed got the flu and impressively projectile barfed to the extent that it was not at all clear what caused it. So doing the '<a>...</a>' to be '[=...=]' thing will take some work beyond a simple-minded blanket find-n-replace (sigh). Also, bikeshed ignores the emphasis portion of '*[=...=]*' and renders the '*'s which seems..uh..suboptimal. So for now some '<em>...</em>' constructs need to stay around -- '<em>[=...=]</em>' works correctly. =JeffHReceived on Thursday, 2 March 2017 23:38:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:24 UTC