- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:28:20 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
@vijaybh wrote: > Looking at the latest changes, I wonder if we could put the CBOR field name back to just "attestation". This would be the only field with such a name, and it would save bytes on a structure that may be produced on an authenticator with limited capability. WDYT? @rlin1 replied in [email here](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2017Jan/0078.html): >If the number of bytes is so important, we could abbreviate attestationObject to "attstnObj" I agree with Rolf @rlin1 and was about to myself suggest something akin to `attstnObj` for the same reasons. -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/321#issuecomment-272210301 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2017 16:28:26 UTC