- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:26:07 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
@vijaybh wrote: > Looking at the latest changes, I wonder if we could put the CBOR field name back to just "attestation". This would be the only field with such a name, and it would save bytes on a structure that may be produced on an authenticator with limited capability. WDYT? @rlin1 replied in [email here](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2017Jan/0078.html): >First I think the spec is much better to read after those changes. We call it attestation statement and the field containing it is also called attestation statement. Same with attestation object. If the number of bytes is so important, we could abbreviate attestationObject to "attstnObj" - that is even fewer bytes than the original. -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/321#issuecomment-272209582 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2017 16:26:13 UTC