Re: [webauthn] Clean up attestation, abstract it from UA, fix TPM format, add U2F format

First I think the spec is much better to read after those changes.
We call it attestation statement and the field containing it is also called
attestation statement.
Same with attestation object.
If the number of bytes is so important, we could abbreviate
attestationObject to "attstnObj" - that is even fewer bytes than the
original.

Kind regards,
   Rolf


On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub <
sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote:

> @rlin1 - Looking at the latest changes, I wonder if we could put the
> CBOR field name back to just "attestation". This would be the only
> field with such a name, and it would save bytes on a structure that
> may be produced on an authenticator with limited capability. WDYT?
>
> --
> GitHub Notification of comment by vijaybh
> Please view or discuss this issue at
> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/321#issuecomment-271991391 using
> your GitHub account
>
>


-- 

*Rolf* *Lindemann*
Senior Director, Products and Technology
D  / rlindemann@noknok.com

*Nok Nok Labs Inc.*
2100 Geng Road, Suite 105
Palo Alto, CA 94303
T +1 650 433 1300
info@noknok.com

*www.noknok.com* <http://www.noknok.com>




<http://www.linkedin.com/company/nok-nok-labs>
<http://www.twitter.com/noknoklabs>
<https://plus.google.com/108217184383559859585>
<http://www.facebook.com/NokNokLabs>