W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > February 2019

Re: WebAppSec Teleconference Timing and Techniques.

From: Giorgio Maone <giorgio@maone.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:48:58 +0100
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Web Application Security Working Group <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <696332e7-f47a-6178-c13a-75664756c6a0@maone.net>
Hi everyone,

1. In southern Europe we tend to be still dining at 11:00 Pacific/20:00
CET (my children included), so probably 1 or 2 hours later would work
better for me, but I would be OK to dine after the call if the majority
prefers this timeslot. Either way, if we change the timeslot from the
current one to anything later I'd need the day to change as well because
of an overlapping commitment on Wednesdays evenings.

2. What about https://meet.jit.si/ ?

3. Collaborative notes and self-scribing are great ideas no matter the
tools, thanks for thinking about them :)

Best,
-- G

On 25/02/19 10:43, Mike West wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> As discussed on the last call
> <https://www.w3.org/2019/02/20-webappsec-minutes.html#item03>, I'd
> like for us to think a little bit about how we're using our time on
> our calls, and whether it might be reasonable to make some changes.
> Three come to mind:
>
> 1.  I've heard from some folks (including me!) that the current
> timeslot isn't working well. It's early for California, dinnertime in
> central Europe, and the middle of the night across Asia. Perhaps it's
> reasonable to consider a shift, and perhaps even a rotation between
> time-zones to allow access to more folks. As a concrete suggestion to
> start a conversation: I'd generally prefer 11:00 Pacific, 20:00 CET
> (as my kids will safely be in bed). How unworkable would that be for
> folks who care about the calls?
>
> 2.  Audio-only conference calls are somewhat awkward. It might be nice
> to try out something that includes video/screen-sharing for somewhat
> more lively conversations (while, of course, retaining audio-only
> options for folks that would prefer for us not to have a camera in
> their house!). I suspect that there's a diversity of preferences in
> this group: Vidyo, Skype, etc. Hangouts are simplest for me
> personally, but I'm willing to try just about anything that works on a
> Chromebook: the TAG is apparently having success
> with https://appear.in/, for instance?
>
> 3.  Scribing in IRC is a pain in the butt. While it's nice to be able
> to rely upon the W3C's tooling for autopublication of minutes after a
> meeting, other groups have been successful with more dynamic methods.
> The TAG, for instance, has been using Cryptpad to take collaborative
> notes during a meeting
> (https://cryptpad.w3ctag.org/code/#/2/code/view/PgABV3fUQYNx4vTY8-dCiaaBGUqfwu+jwduYlO6Lzao/),
> and then posting the final result to GitHub
> (https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2019/02-tokyo/02-07-minutes.md).
> That's a model that makes sense to me. Perhaps we could try it out?
>
> WDYT?
>
> -mike


-- 
Giorgio Maone
https://maone.net
Received on Monday, 25 February 2019 20:49:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 February 2019 20:49:24 UTC