- From: Evan J Johnson <e@ejj.io>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:50:21 -0700
- To: public-webappsec@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1476737421.2694391.758871425.5082B21B@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Ah thanks Emily. I can see it's a hard question to answer now. Whatever is processed last, but with one edge cases. If I understand the precedence is (from highest to lowest): . ReferrerPolicy is no-referrer, or rel="noreferrer". 1. Implicit, via inheritence. 3. Any other referrerpolicy attribute that is not "no-referrer" 4. Meta-tag. 5.HTTP Header evan On Sun, Oct 16, 2016, at 09:09 AM, Emily Stark wrote: > Hi Evan, > If the browser recognizes the policy in a meta tag as a valid policy, > then it would override any policy set by a header for the document. > This is mentioned in > https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-referrer-policy/#unknown-policy-values > ("the value of the latest one will be used"), though I'd happily take > suggestions on how to make it clearer! > Emily > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Evan J Johnson <e@ejj.io> wrote: >> __ >> Glad to see this is being finished! >> >> I'm curious the order of precedence of the 5 different ways to set a >> referrer policy. >> >> This is very confusing in my opinion (something I will begin to say >> about a lot of specs). The spec reads like the following is possible, >> unless I'm missing something: >> >> 1. Blanket referrer policy set by header. >> 2. Different referrer policy set by meta tag. >> 3. Third policy as an attribute. >> >> I would assume the the most specific policy would win, in this case >> the noreferrer attribute, but which policy wins out of 1 and 2? >> >> >> evan >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016, at 09:18 PM, Emily Stark wrote: >>> This is a call for consensus of the WebAppSec WG to request >>> advancement of Referrer Policy to Candidate Recommendation. >>> >>> The text for the proposed CR draft is to be the Editor's Draft at: >>> https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-referrer-policy/ >>> >>> This call for consensus will expire on 23-October-2016. Positive >>> feedback is encouraged and lack of feedback is considered "no >>> objection". Please send feedback to: public-webappsec@w3.org with a >>> subject line beginning with '[REFERRER]'. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Emily >>
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 20:50:45 UTC