W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Split the `w3c/webappsec` respository?

From: Jochen Eisinger <eisinger@google.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:34:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CALjhuif1mxxhoPUZamhW7Xri-WqLvSKrrTd-gtkFLG9LnUNmKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Cc: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>, Joel Weinberger <jww@google.com>, Devdatta Akhawe <dev@dropbox.com>, David Ross <drx@google.com>, Yan Zhu <yan@eff.org>, Deian Stefan <deian@cs.stanford.edu>
+1

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:34 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:

> In https://twitter.com/mikewest/status/639400263007236096, I asked The
> Internets whether or not we should split the `w3c/webappsec` repository
> into a dozen or so specification-specific repositories. There wasn't a ton
> of response either way, but the folks who wanted the repository split
> seemed a little more vehement in their advocacy. :)
>
> What say ye, public-webappsec@? Do you like the single repository for
> everything? Or would you prefer one repository per specification (with the
> `w3c/webappsec` repository remaining for things like the charter, and as an
> index/redirect machine for all the WG's specs)?
>
> CCing chairs and editors explicitly, as they'll be most effected if we
> change things up.
>
> -mike
>
> --
> Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest
>
> Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München,
> Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der
> Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth
> Flores
> (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2015 08:35:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:15 UTC