+1
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:34 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> In https://twitter.com/mikewest/status/639400263007236096, I asked The
> Internets whether or not we should split the `w3c/webappsec` repository
> into a dozen or so specification-specific repositories. There wasn't a ton
> of response either way, but the folks who wanted the repository split
> seemed a little more vehement in their advocacy. :)
>
> What say ye, public-webappsec@? Do you like the single repository for
> everything? Or would you prefer one repository per specification (with the
> `w3c/webappsec` repository remaining for things like the charter, and as an
> index/redirect machine for all the WG's specs)?
>
> CCing chairs and editors explicitly, as they'll be most effected if we
> change things up.
>
> -mike
>
> --
> Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest
>
> Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München,
> Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der
> Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth
> Flores
> (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
>