Re: Permissions API vs local APIs

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <> wrote:
> I think Mozilla would be fine with taking the permission API as a
> dependency and implement that at the same time. Implementing the
> permission API should be fairly trivial for us.
> But we should verify this with the people actually working on the push API.
>> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Michael van Ouwerkerk
>> <> wrote:
>>> Yes, we wanted to ensure this is in the Push API because that seems to
>>> have more implementation momentum from browser vendors than the Permissions
>>> API. We didn't want developers to do hacky things in the meantime. I agree
>>> that once the Permissions API has critical mass, that should be the single
>>> place for checking permissions.

Martin, Doug?


Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 15:40:04 UTC