- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 17:39:29 +0200
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Martin Thomson <mt@mozilla.com>, Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Miguel Garcia <miguelg@chromium.org>, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > I think Mozilla would be fine with taking the permission API as a > dependency and implement that at the same time. Implementing the > permission API should be fairly trivial for us. > > But we should verify this with the people actually working on the push API. > >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Michael van Ouwerkerk >> <mvanouwerkerk@google.com> wrote: >>> Yes, we wanted to ensure this is in the Push API because that seems to >>> have more implementation momentum from browser vendors than the Permissions >>> API. We didn't want developers to do hacky things in the meantime. I agree >>> that once the Permissions API has critical mass, that should be the single >>> place for checking permissions. Martin, Doug? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 15:40:04 UTC