If Firefox, IE, and Safari have one behavior, and Chrome/Opera have another, then it seems like we can claim interoperability in either direction. Since that's what the group agreed to do a few months ago, it surprises me that Chrome's SW implementation made a different decision. *shrug* On Jul 17, 2015 20:46, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > > Nevertheless, I believe we decided in the F2F earlier this week to > > transition the document to PR as it stands, and to come back to the > question > > of exclusions (both for SW and for things like EME) in a "Level 2" > document > > (Brad, Wendy, does that match your recollection?). > > So you decided to advance something assuming it was interoperable. > However, now you know that Chrome does not implement it and therefore > other browsers cannot implement either (if they wish to remain > competitive). I don't see how sticking to your original resolution in > light of the facts helps or how you'll show interoperability. > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 19:06:30 UTC