- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:33:19 +0200
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Cc: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Kristijan Burnik <burnik@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > If Firefox, IE, and Safari have one behavior, and Chrome/Opera have another, > then it seems like we can claim interoperability in either direction. Since > that's what the group agreed to do a few months ago, it surprises me that > Chrome's SW implementation made a different decision. *shrug* I guess, but it'd be bullshit. Anyone who wants to ship service workers and work with deployed content needs Chrome's behavior. Why publish something that's known to be broken? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 19:33:44 UTC