- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 20:46:05 +0200
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, Kristijan Burnik <burnik@google.com>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > Nevertheless, I believe we decided in the F2F earlier this week to > transition the document to PR as it stands, and to come back to the question > of exclusions (both for SW and for things like EME) in a "Level 2" document > (Brad, Wendy, does that match your recollection?). So you decided to advance something assuming it was interoperable. However, now you know that Chrome does not implement it and therefore other browsers cannot implement either (if they wish to remain competitive). I don't see how sticking to your original resolution in light of the facts helps or how you'll show interoperability. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 17 July 2015 18:46:31 UTC