Re: Reviewing the Charter

+1 welcome to the group!

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 05:44 Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote:

> Welcome, Josh!
>
> As a document voted on and ratified by the entire W3C membership, I'm not
> actually sure we can correct even typographic errors in a charter without a
> considerable process overhead.
>
> I look forward to having even a small fraction of your boundless energy
> and attention to detail turned in the direction of our specs!
>
> -Brad
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:27 PM timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm officially joining the WebAppSec WG (as an IE).
>>
>> One of the requirements for joining was that I fill out a survey:
>>
>> > I ... as W3C Invited Expert,
>> > have reviewed the Web Application Security Working Group charter [1]
>>
>> I do hope to attend regular calls :)
>>
>> This appears to be a pair of Oxford commas:
>> > This recommendation will not address user agent implementations of
>> permissions, including their scope, duration, granularity, or user
>> interface and experience for indicating, configuring, or asking for
>> permissions.
>>
>> This appears to be a pair of non-Oxford conjunctions:
>> > They may transclude, reference or have information flows between
>> resources at the same, related or different origins.
>>
>>
>> > Manageability
>> > The WG will document and create uniform experiences for several
>> undefined areas of major utility, including:
>> > ...
>> only this bullet ends with a period:
>> > * Application awareness of features which may require explicit user
>> permission to enable.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/03/webappsec-charter-2015.html
>>
>>