Re: Reviewing the Charter

Welcome, Josh!

As a document voted on and ratified by the entire W3C membership, I'm not
actually sure we can correct even typographic errors in a charter without a
considerable process overhead.

I look forward to having even a small fraction of your boundless energy and
attention to detail turned in the direction of our specs!

-Brad


On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:27 PM timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm officially joining the WebAppSec WG (as an IE).
>
> One of the requirements for joining was that I fill out a survey:
>
> > I ... as W3C Invited Expert,
> > have reviewed the Web Application Security Working Group charter [1]
>
> I do hope to attend regular calls :)
>
> This appears to be a pair of Oxford commas:
> > This recommendation will not address user agent implementations of
> permissions, including their scope, duration, granularity, or user
> interface and experience for indicating, configuring, or asking for
> permissions.
>
> This appears to be a pair of non-Oxford conjunctions:
> > They may transclude, reference or have information flows between
> resources at the same, related or different origins.
>
>
> > Manageability
> > The WG will document and create uniform experiences for several
> undefined areas of major utility, including:
> > ...
> only this bullet ends with a period:
> > * Application awareness of features which may require explicit user
> permission to enable.
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/03/webappsec-charter-2015.html
>
>