Thanks again, Julian! On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > ABNF is correct; I'd just use two different ABNF productions for parameter > for clarity. > I don't understand how that would increase clarity. :) Right. You should also explain that the ABNF is per RFC 5234 plus the list > syntax extension defined in RFC 7230. For sample text see < > http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-latest.html#notational-conventions > >. > Addressed in https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/commit/245c10b4f3f862ca341e5dedd03d7808a15d20dc, thanks! -mike
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 05:58:35 UTC