- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:48:18 +0200
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKXHy=eVcDZWJ9-15Uf3AaDpURRUHvxshHSC_z2GvxCwZM4RCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks all. Apologies; I was on vacation last week, on a warm beach and mostly internet free. Obviously, the call completely slipped my mind. :( I'll spin up a CR-draft of the document later this week once folks come back from labor day vacation and review the changes I've made in response to some of the questions raised on this and other threads. Thanks! -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > We revisited closing Last Call for CSP Level 2 today on the call, but > it was right at the end of the meeting, a number of participants had > to drop early, and the group had a bit of decision fatigue, so though > there were no objections, assent was also less than vigorous. > > Therefore we resolved to close LC pending the following: > > 1) That the client hint (CH-CSP) and child-src features be marked as AT > RISK. > 2) Clarification that path components are ignored for frame-ancestors > enforcement > 3) That there are no further objections on the list. > > Regarding #3, if you are reading this object to closing the LC period > for Level 2, please reply before 23:59 PDT, 27-Aug-2014 (midnight > tonight, Pacific) stating your objection. > > If no further objections are voiced, Last Call be considered closed at > that time. > > thank you, > > Brad Hill > >
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 14:49:06 UTC