- From: Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:41:47 +0530
- To: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Hi Trevor > 1) Why does the content-type need to be specified in the link? Why > not just include it as input to the hash? I believe this is because the existing RFC already uses the syntax. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920#section-3.1 > 2) The "ni://" prefix seems pointless, why not just name the attribute > after the hash algo, i.e. Again, I believe this is because of the existing RFC, which defined this format. thanks Dev
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 02:12:35 UTC