I hope there's a plan to publish the referenced FETCH spec as a W3C document rather than WHATWG, otherwise this will produce a comment to that effect during LC. There shouldn't be any normative refs to WHATWG docs by the time CR ends. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > I added a reference to Fetch in > https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/commit/d7e403245d3ac81033b8c3e898bf60f7c3e3a2af > > The editor's draft has been updated accordingly: > http://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/subresourceintegrity/#modifications-to-fetch-1 > > Apologies for the oversight. That was my fault. > > -mike > > -- > Mike West <mkwst@google.com> > Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 > > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany > Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg > Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores > (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>wrote: > >> Hi David. >> >> There are references and acknowledgements in the draft. See >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SRI/#acknowledgements-1> for acknowledgements and >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SRI/#references> for references (just below). >> >> We will add a reference that points to Fetch quite soon. If you have >> additional suggestions what should be linked, feel free to tell us >> through this list or file an issue on Github >> <https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/issues>. >> >> Thanks! >> Frederik >> > >
Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 15:10:17 UTC