W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Call for Consensus: Subresource Integrity to FPWD.

From: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:37:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CACj=BEjPXpbDio10dO9cRXYq+awUmsNZGMKvxtY44+5HgDjrtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, Joel Weinberger <jww@google.com>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote:
> >> Additionally, srcset[1] contains some challenges and probably merits
> >> an issue in the draft.
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/
> >
> > Yes, I hadn't considered that at all, and you're entirely correct that
> it's
> > challenging. Is srcset the syntax folks have settled on, or is discussion
> > around alternate syntaxes still ongoing?
> >
> > Yoav? Can you comment on that question?
>

srcset is part of the final responsive images syntax we've settled on (the
draft quoted above, as well as the picture specification [1]).


>
> Not Yoav, but I believe srcset has shipped in several implementations
> now.


Yeah. srcset is already shipped in Blink (M34). it's also been implemented
in WebKit for a while now.


> You could imagine having integrityset as additional attribute on
> the side... Or maybe the syntax allows for embedding integrity
> somehow?
>
--
> http://annevankesteren.nl/


[1] http://picture.responsiveimages.org/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 12:37:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:05 UTC