On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote: > >> Additionally, srcset[1] contains some challenges and probably merits > >> an issue in the draft. > >> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/ > > > > Yes, I hadn't considered that at all, and you're entirely correct that > it's > > challenging. Is srcset the syntax folks have settled on, or is discussion > > around alternate syntaxes still ongoing? > > > > Yoav? Can you comment on that question? > srcset is part of the final responsive images syntax we've settled on (the draft quoted above, as well as the picture specification [1]). > > Not Yoav, but I believe srcset has shipped in several implementations > now. Yeah. srcset is already shipped in Blink (M34). it's also been implemented in WebKit for a while now. > You could imagine having integrityset as additional attribute on > the side... Or maybe the syntax allows for embedding integrity > somehow? > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ [1] http://picture.responsiveimages.org/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 12:37:54 UTC