W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Call for Consensus: Subresource Integrity to FPWD.

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:02:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnb78hZEQW9woJHFCrkYZcmxezuO-9XdQ6vzjqeRaqDxdVpPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, Joel Weinberger <jww@google.com>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote:
>> Additionally, srcset[1] contains some challenges and probably merits
>> an issue in the draft.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/
>
> Yes, I hadn't considered that at all, and you're entirely correct that it's
> challenging. Is srcset the syntax folks have settled on, or is discussion
> around alternate syntaxes still ongoing?
>
> Yoav? Can you comment on that question?

Not Yoav, but I believe srcset has shipped in several implementations
now. You could imagine having integrityset as additional attribute on
the side... Or maybe the syntax allows for embedding integrity
somehow?


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 12:02:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:05 UTC