W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Call for Consensus: Subresource Integrity to FPWD.

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:02:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnb78hZEQW9woJHFCrkYZcmxezuO-9XdQ6vzjqeRaqDxdVpPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, Joel Weinberger <jww@google.com>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote:
>> Additionally, srcset[1] contains some challenges and probably merits
>> an issue in the draft.
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/
> Yes, I hadn't considered that at all, and you're entirely correct that it's
> challenging. Is srcset the syntax folks have settled on, or is discussion
> around alternate syntaxes still ongoing?
> Yoav? Can you comment on that question?

Not Yoav, but I believe srcset has shipped in several implementations
now. You could imagine having integrityset as additional attribute on
the side... Or maybe the syntax allows for embedding integrity

Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 12:02:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:37 UTC