- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:02:02 +0000
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, Joel Weinberger <jww@google.com>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote: >> Additionally, srcset[1] contains some challenges and probably merits >> an issue in the draft. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/ > > Yes, I hadn't considered that at all, and you're entirely correct that it's > challenging. Is srcset the syntax folks have settled on, or is discussion > around alternate syntaxes still ongoing? > > Yoav? Can you comment on that question? Not Yoav, but I believe srcset has shipped in several implementations now. You could imagine having integrityset as additional attribute on the side... Or maybe the syntax allows for embedding integrity somehow? -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 12:02:30 UTC