+1 to level 2 or simply CSP2 On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > I'm in the process of compiling a high-level list of changes from CSP 1.0 > to the 1.1 draft. There are more than several. And one or two > backwards-incompatible changes. > > I'd be more comfortable if the version number reflected that; I don't > really think this is a +0.1 set of changes. > > Would the WG be comfortable bumping to "level 2" rather than "1.1"? > > -- > Mike West <mkwst@google.com> > Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 > > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany > Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg > Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores > (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) >Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 07:16:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:05 UTC