W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Naming things: CSP 1.1 -> CSP level 2?

From: Hill, Brad <bhill@paypal.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:14:33 +0000
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, "Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla. com>" <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54719592-EDB3-497C-B50B-DCA7A9132C07@paypal.com>
That sounds good to me.

I do expect this will put a little more pressure than there already is from the director / director's designee to advance Level 1 all the way to REC before it gets passed by Level 2.  The only thing really holding that up right now is the test suite, which I'm trying to make progress on, but could definitely use some other volunteers.


On Jun 23, 2014, at 11:32 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:

> I'm in the process of compiling a high-level list of changes from CSP 1.0 to the 1.1 draft. There are more than several. And one or two backwards-incompatible changes.
> I'd be more comfortable if the version number reflected that; I don't really think this is a +0.1 set of changes.
> Would the WG be comfortable bumping to "level 2" rather than "1.1"?
> --
> Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91
> Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany
> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
> Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
> (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:15:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:39 UTC