Naming things: CSP 1.1 -> CSP level 2?

I'm in the process of compiling a high-level list of changes from CSP 1.0
to the 1.1 draft. There are more than several. And one or two
backwards-incompatible changes.

I'd be more comfortable if the version number reflected that; I don't
really think this is a +0.1 set of changes.

Would the WG be comfortable bumping to "level 2" rather than "1.1"?

Mike West <>
Google+:, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91

Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
(Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 06:33:12 UTC