- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 00:43:50 -0600
- To: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 06:44:38 UTC
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 10/2/2013 6:39 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: > > An add-on author that reads this may complain to a UA vendor that > > ignores it, saying "you didn't do what the spec said you should do". > > That's often sufficient to warrant implementing it. > > Users and add-on authors are already complaining and they don't really > care what the spec says. > My conclusion is that a static policy is detrimental to some party's interests, no matter which direction that policy takes. A more dynamic policy would seem more appropriate. > > -Dan Veditz > >
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 06:44:38 UTC