Re: [webappsec] POLL: Getting CSP 1.1 to LCWD

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 10/2/2013 6:39 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> > An add-on author that reads this may complain to a UA vendor that
> > ignores it, saying "you didn't do what the spec said you should do".
> > That's often sufficient to warrant implementing it.
>
> Users and add-on authors are already complaining and they don't really
> care what the spec says.
>

My conclusion is that a static policy is detrimental to some party's
interests, no matter which direction that policy takes. A more dynamic
policy would seem more appropriate.


>
> -Dan Veditz
>
>

Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 06:44:38 UTC