W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [webappsec] POLL: Getting CSP 1.1 to LCWD

From: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:03:21 -0700
Message-ID: <524CDE79.5040103@mozilla.com>
To: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>

On 10/2/2013 6:39 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> An add-on author that reads this may complain to a UA vendor that
> ignores it, saying "you didn't do what the spec said you should do".
> That's often sufficient to warrant implementing it.

Users and add-on authors are already complaining and they don't really
care what the spec says.

-Dan Veditz

application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 03:03:55 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Glenn Adams: "Re: [webappsec] POLL: Getting CSP 1.1 to LCWD"
Previous message: Glenn Adams: "Re: [webappsec] POLL: Getting CSP 1.1 to LCWD"
In reply to: Glenn Adams: "Re: [webappsec] POLL: Getting CSP 1.1 to LCWD"
Next in thread: Glenn Adams: "Re: [webappsec] POLL: Getting CSP 1.1 to LCWD"
Reply: Glenn Adams: "Re: [webappsec] POLL: Getting CSP 1.1 to LCWD"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:03 UTC