- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 06:38:37 +0900
- To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
- Cc: W3C Web App Security WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Note that the W3C also has on online HTML diff service: http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff But it seems to have some problems at times. When I tried to use it to compare the current tip against rev db6a34dad6cb, the output seems to get truncated - http://goo.gl/Gf5xZ But anyway, looking at the output that it does give, and comparing it to the daisydiff output, the daisydiff output looks a lot more readable. --Mike "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, 2011-11-26 18:03 +0900: > =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>, 2011-11-22 14:32 -0800: > > > > Should we add something to the agenda to discuss whether we like the > > > refactoring of the spec in > > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/raw-file/tip/experimental.html > > > > do you know of a tool that can generate a side-by-side diff between this and > > the preceding version of the spec? > > I generated a diff that seems to do a pretty good job of showing what's > changed, and put it here: > > http://people.w3.org/mike/diffs/csp/diff-to-db6a34dad6cb.html > > It's a diff of the tip against rev db6a34dad6cb (when the experimental > version was forked) - > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/rev/db6a34dad6cb > > It's not a side-by-side diff but instead an HTML diff, generated using > Daisy Diff - > > http://code.google.com/p/daisydiff/ > -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+
Received on Saturday, 26 November 2011 21:38:44 UTC