- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:22:27 +1100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>, public-webapps@w3.org, public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>, Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com>, "chaals@yandex.ru" <chaals@yandex.ru>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
> On 18 Mar 2019, at 09:38, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > Who owns the data- namespace? I ask because this smells like a problem of the sort that RFC 6648 describes. That is, if this is successful, you will have two problems: now you have to support data-foo in perpetuity and the owners of data-* have to avoid using whatever names you squatted on. The point of initially using data-*, which developers own, is to figure out what the right model is and to show some kind of prototype: not intended to be deployed at web scale.
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2019 23:22:54 UTC