- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:00:51 -0500
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Update below ...
Hi All,
The Web Messaging testing data now shows relatively good
interoperability (see [All],[<2]). However, there are two tests that
have only one pass:
1. <http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/with-ports/026.html>. Only
passes on FF.
2. <http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html>. Only
passes on IE.
I welcome feedback on whether these failures are considered minor/major
implementation bugs, minor/major interoperability problems; that is,
should we propose moving [CR] to Proposed Recommendation with these
failures, or block until there are two or more passes.
-Thanks, AB
[All] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/all.html
[<2] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/less-than-2.html
[CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-webmessaging-20120501/
On 11/23/14 6:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi Cindy, Kris, All,
>
> Earlier today I ran the webmessaging tests on Chrome, FF, IE and Opera
> (12.16) and uploaded the results plus the wptreport files to
> [test-results]. The good news is that 104/118 tests (~90%) have 2 or
> more passes, however, there are also 14 tests with less than passes.
>
> Do you have some time to look at the [<2] failures? For each of these
> failures, it would be helpful to know which ones are actually test
> case failures versus implementation bugs, and in the case of impl
> bugs, to get a sense of their priority (f.ex. {low,medium,high} impact
> on interoperability.
>
> Naturally, we would appreciate help from anyone that is willing to
> review these failures.
>
> -Thanks, ArtB
>
> [test-results]
> <https://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/webmessaging>
> [<2] <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/less-than-2.html>
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 14:01:20 UTC