W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: HTML imports in Firefox

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:09:01 -0500
Message-ID: <548F3FDD.3080500@gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-webapps@w3.org

On 12/15/14 2:09 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 12/15/14, 1:10 PM, Ashley Gullen wrote:
>> Why would modules affect the decision to ship HTML imports?
>
> Because the interaction of the various import systems with each other 
> needs to be specified, for one thing.
>
> But more to the point, we're not shipping imports because we've gotten 
> feedback from a number of people that imports are not solving the 
> problems they actually need solved.  We'd prefer to not ship imports 
> and then need to ship yet another HTML import system that solves those 
> problems.

Hi Boris,

Does [Bugzilla] capture all of Mozilla's Imports concerns (or at least 
the higher priority issues)? If not, who should I contact to request 
capturing your concerns?

(It appears you have participated in two Imports bugs [BZ].)

-Thanks, ArtB

[Bugzilla] 
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Component%20Model&list_id=49215&product=WebAppsWG&query_format=advanced&short_desc=%5BImports%5D&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr>

[BZ] 
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Component%20Model&email1=bzbarsky%40mit.edu&emailassigned_to1=1&emailcc1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&emailqa_contact1=1&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=49216&product=WebAppsWG&query_format=advanced&short_desc=%5BImports%5D&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr>
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 20:09:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:27:20 UTC