- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:09:01 -0500
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-webapps@w3.org
On 12/15/14 2:09 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 12/15/14, 1:10 PM, Ashley Gullen wrote: >> Why would modules affect the decision to ship HTML imports? > > Because the interaction of the various import systems with each other > needs to be specified, for one thing. > > But more to the point, we're not shipping imports because we've gotten > feedback from a number of people that imports are not solving the > problems they actually need solved. We'd prefer to not ship imports > and then need to ship yet another HTML import system that solves those > problems. Hi Boris, Does [Bugzilla] capture all of Mozilla's Imports concerns (or at least the higher priority issues)? If not, who should I contact to request capturing your concerns? (It appears you have participated in two Imports bugs [BZ].) -Thanks, ArtB [Bugzilla] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Component%20Model&list_id=49215&product=WebAppsWG&query_format=advanced&short_desc=%5BImports%5D&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr> [BZ] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=Component%20Model&email1=bzbarsky%40mit.edu&emailassigned_to1=1&emailcc1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&emailqa_contact1=1&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=49216&product=WebAppsWG&query_format=advanced&short_desc=%5BImports%5D&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr>
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 20:09:26 UTC