- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:01:50 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: >> [Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html > It would be nice if editor's draft points to https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/ That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or not. Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests? I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate. Would that work for you Anne? > I no longer work for Opera Software. Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know what you do want.) > The Status of this Document section should probably not mention the > mailing list Yes, I agree that for a gutted spec including mail list info isn't especially useful, although it doesn't seem like including that info is especially harmful. Anyhow, I believe TR PubRules require a comment list. Yves, Cindy, PHL - is a comment mail list required in the SotD? > or bug tracker. Are you still using Bugzilla? If so, it seems like a link to it should be included. -Thanks, AB
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 14:28:38 UTC