W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:51:30 -0500
Message-ID: <545CF892.3020500@inkedblade.net>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> [Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html
>> It would be nice if editor's draft points to https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/
> That would be OK with me but as a W3C TR I'm not sure if that is permitted or not.
> Yves, Cindy, PLH - can we do as Anne suggests?

I'm pretty sure there is no rule against pointing to another spec in a Note.

> I suppose another option is to remove the Editor's Draft from the boilerplate.

It probably makes sense to do that anyway. They should both point to the
currently-maintained draft.

Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 16:52:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:32 UTC