Re: CfC: publish a WG Note of Fullscreen; deadline November 14

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
> what you do want.)

I would prefer just Mozilla. It's not a legal matter, after all.


> Yes, I agree that for a gutted spec including mail list info isn't
> especially useful, although it doesn't seem like including that info is
> especially harmful. Anyhow, I believe TR PubRules require a comment list.
> Yves, Cindy, PHL - is a comment mail list required in the SotD?
>
>> or bug tracker.
>
> Are you still using Bugzilla? If so, it seems like a link to it should be
> included.

Why would I want feedback on this Note?

(It's cool with you that I keep using the WebAppsWG product?)


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 14:06:10 UTC