W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:33:38 -0400
Message-ID: <5420BFE2.6090005@gmail.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <sicking@mozilla.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
During this CfC, Jonas submitted some comments to this list starting 
with the following:

<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0531.html>

Jonas - did Mounir's responses adequately address your comments or is 
there something you propose be done before LCWD is published?

There were also comments by Anne on Github (see [1]) and as I understand 
it, those comments were addressed by Mounir. Anne - would you please 
confirm if your comments have been adequately addressed?

-Thanks, ArtB

[1] https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/commits/gh-pages

On 9/11/14 5:19 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen 
> Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the 
> latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis:
>
>   <https://w3c.github.io/screen-orientation/>
>
> The spec has three open Issues, all labeled Future + Enhancement and 
> the Editors propose these Issues not be addressed for this first 
> version of the spec:
>
>   <https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues>
>
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's 
> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process 
> Document used by this group states the following regarding the 
> significance/meaning of a LCWD:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
>
> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant 
> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) 
> in the Working Draft;
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant 
> dependencies with other groups;
>
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these 
> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement 
> is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the 
> technical report to later maturity levels.
> ]]
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them 
> to public-webapps @ w3.org by September 18 at the latest. Positive 
> response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as 
> agreement with the proposal.
>
> The proposed review period is 4 weeks.
>
> Assuming this CfC passes, if there are any specific groups (e.g. 
> script-coord, TAG, WAI, Privacy IG, Security IG, Mobile IG, etc.) or 
> external SDOs we should explicitly ask to review the LCWD, please let 
> us know.
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 00:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:26 UTC