- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:33:38 -0400
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <sicking@mozilla.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
During this CfC, Jonas submitted some comments to this list starting with the following: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0531.html> Jonas - did Mounir's responses adequately address your comments or is there something you propose be done before LCWD is published? There were also comments by Anne on Github (see [1]) and as I understand it, those comments were addressed by Mounir. Anne - would you please confirm if your comments have been adequately addressed? -Thanks, ArtB [1] https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/commits/gh-pages On 9/11/14 5:19 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen > Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the > latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis: > > <https://w3c.github.io/screen-orientation/> > > The spec has three open Issues, all labeled Future + Enhancement and > the Editors propose these Issues not be addressed for this first > version of the spec: > > <https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues> > > This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's > decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process > Document used by this group states the following regarding the > significance/meaning of a LCWD: > > [[ > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call > > Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that: > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant > technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) > in the Working Draft; > > * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant > dependencies with other groups; > > * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these > dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement > is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the > technical report to later maturity levels. > ]] > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them > to public-webapps @ w3.org by September 18 at the latest. Positive > response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as > agreement with the proposal. > > The proposed review period is 4 weeks. > > Assuming this CfC passes, if there are any specific groups (e.g. > script-coord, TAG, WAI, Privacy IG, Security IG, Mobile IG, etc.) or > external SDOs we should explicitly ask to review the LCWD, please let > us know. > > -Thanks, AB > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 00:34:08 UTC