Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Screen Orientation API; deadline September 18

During this CfC, Jonas submitted some comments to this list starting 
with the following:


Jonas - did Mounir's responses adequately address your comments or is 
there something you propose be done before LCWD is published?

There were also comments by Anne on Github (see [1]) and as I understand 
it, those comments were addressed by Mounir. Anne - would you please 
confirm if your comments have been adequately addressed?

-Thanks, ArtB


On 9/11/14 5:19 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Mounir and Marcos would like to publish a LCWD of The Screen 
> Orientation API and this is a Call for Consensus to do using the 
> latest ED (not yet in the LCWD template) as the basis:
>   <>
> The spec has three open Issues, all labeled Future + Enhancement and 
> the Editors propose these Issues not be addressed for this first 
> version of the spec:
>   <>
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's 
> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process 
> Document used by this group states the following regarding the 
> significance/meaning of a LCWD:
> [[
> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant 
> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) 
> in the Working Draft;
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant 
> dependencies with other groups;
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these 
> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement 
> is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the 
> technical report to later maturity levels.
> ]]
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them 
> to public-webapps @ by September 18 at the latest. Positive 
> response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as 
> agreement with the proposal.
> The proposed review period is 4 weeks.
> Assuming this CfC passes, if there are any specific groups (e.g. 
> script-coord, TAG, WAI, Privacy IG, Security IG, Mobile IG, etc.) or 
> external SDOs we should explicitly ask to review the LCWD, please let 
> us know.
> -Thanks, AB

Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 00:34:08 UTC