On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 11/09/2014 00:14 , Glenn Adams wrote: > >> WHATWG specs are not legitimate for reference by W3C specs. Their IPR >> status is indeterminate and they do not follow a consensus process. >> > > This is blatant trolling as well as factually wrong in every single > statement that it makes. > I would say something impolite and vulgar at this point. But you've already pulled down this thread to the gutter Robin by resorting to name calling, so I won't do that. > > I would invite all of you to not feed this thread as it can't possibly > lead anywhere useful. You mean, don't feed it like you are doing? As a W3T member, I would think it your duty to stay out of the fray. Best listen to your duty. > > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon >
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 17:20:13 UTC