- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:20:58 +0200
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 11/09/2014 00:14 , Glenn Adams wrote: > WHATWG specs are not legitimate for reference by W3C specs. Their IPR > status is indeterminate and they do not follow a consensus process. This is blatant trolling as well as factually wrong in every single statement that it makes. I would invite all of you to not feed this thread as it can't possibly lead anywhere useful. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 12:21:09 UTC