- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:18:01 -0400
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 9/11/14, 12:52 PM, Mark Baker wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >>> In which case the WHATWG version wouldn't be "canonical" anymore anyway. >> >> It would be for implementers. > > Only those implementers that can afford to staff a team to keep up > with a moving target. That's not all potential implementers. Mark, the options are to have a team do that or to have a team to reverse-engineer the other implementations. Assuming you want to be interoperable with said implementations, of course. Tracking a well-written spec is _usually_ simpler than reverse-engineering other implementations... -Boris
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 17:18:27 UTC