- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:52:36 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> In which case the WHATWG version wouldn't be "canonical" anymore anyway. > > It would be for implementers. Only those implementers that can afford to staff a team to keep up with a moving target. That's not all potential implementers.
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 16:53:04 UTC