W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: XMLHttpRequest: uppercasing method names

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:37:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CADC=+jeEDqsS03B8Yx+dBp-mDOG8VfrHfkTvAfoJ5b4PQtjekQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Aug 12, 2014 9:29 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>
> In https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/120 the
> question came up whether we should perhaps always uppercase method
> names as that is what people seem to expect. mnot seemed okay with
> adding appropriate advice on the HTTP side.
>
> The alternative is that we stick with our current subset and make that
> consistent across APIs, and treat other method names as
> case-sensitive.
>
> I somewhat prefer always uppercasing, but that would require changes
> to XMLHttpRequest.
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>

Both seem like common enough answers to this question that I think either
works.  I prefer the later just for consistency sake with xhr and the off
chance that we forgot to consider -something- with a change.  If there's no
really good reason to change it, least change is better IMO
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 13:37:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:26 UTC